The story reads more as a sex-drugs-and-philosophy parable than psychologically compelling drama with a recognisable story arc or a satisfying conclusion, but it was engagingly written and accessible.

The story itself seemed to me in the tradition of the 1990s bestseller The Celestine Prophecy, where fiction is used as a vehicle for delivering teaching about a philosophical viewpoint, and I know there are lots of readers for this genre. Without Opposite: A Philosophical Adventure (Unlock Tao) Marcel Eschauzier (42) Kindle Edition 7.56 Existential Rationalism: Handling Humes Fork (Unlock Tao) Marcel Eschauzier (120) Kindle Edition 11. Mouse wheel scrolls opposite direction, Lagarde-viaur, Exonerated bail. Is this ground breaking, or something else? Why does a writer of fiction need to include two separate commentaries on the nature of being before he commences his story? Are the claims and philosophical discussions presented in them either logical or coherent? I will leave that to other reviewers to determine, but it seemed to me that at times in this section of Without Opposite Eschauzier indulges in a kind of non-peer-reviewed one-sided unsupported academic grandstanding. Hs code cable terminal, Tu estuda no brisolo, Coc gemming from th1 to th10. I began reading Without Opposite, which from the outset discusses the nature of reality vs people’s experiences of reality, with one very clear fact in my mind (whether the author agrees that is possible is another matter): I have never before encountered a work of fiction that includes a Preface, an Introduction and a Prologue, before it moves on to a series of chapters which are numbered in reverse order. I’m sure that readers and lovers of esoterica will enjoy the somewhat psychedelic, is it a dream or is it real nature of Marcel Eschauzier’s Without Opposite.

Without Opposite by Marcel Eschauzier